People with good intentions, even
authors, can be heard here and there telling aspiring writers (more on this
later) "Be sure to write what you know." Writing about what I know
would be horribly boring: trust me, I work in IT. What else do I
"know?" Well, let's see, I know baseball, chess, and few other odds
and ends. Maybe I even know a lot about things. The problem is, I don't want to
write about those. I want to write about World War II.
"Ah ha," say the
write-what-you-know people. "That's what you know!"
Yeah, okay, you got me . . . not
really. I love World War II history. I have a passion for knowledge on that era
of human history and am constantly learning about it (see Passion below).
"You should still write what
you know!"
Uh . . . really? No. How about
“learn what you write?”
Here’s why I think write what you
know is the worst advice.
1 - Imagination
Dreaming stuff up is what writers
do. You know how you role play, maybe when you're taking something back to the
store for a return and you play this little movie in your head about how it
will go? I say this then they say that, etc.? Welcome to my world. That's how I
write. I spin up a little movie and I watch it and write what I see. I'll grant
you it's more complicated than that, but that's the basis for my work.
Sometimes when I'm writing a scene, I don't quite know exactly what will
happen, so I rely on that movie. I'm often the first reader to be surprised by
an event in my own books.
If it weren't for writers'
imaginations we wouldn't have stories that take place in space, or the future,
or in a country different from our own. Let’s use an example: the
late Tom Clancy. He single-handedly created the techno-thriller, although I’m
pretty sure he wasn’t calling it that when he was writing it, he was just
telling a story he’d like to read. By the way, when he sold The Hunt for Red October, he was still
working as an insurance agent. So how did he “know” all that technical stuff?
See Research below.
2 - Passion
As I said above, I have that exact
thing for WWII history. Other people like aliens, vampires, spies, or maybe a
vampire spy (hmm . . .) , the list goes
on. Write what you're passionate about. If you love it, it will come across in your
writing and your readers will pick up on it.
3 - Research
Some authors, very successful ones
I might add, talk about going to the place they are using as a setting to get a
feel for the people and the locale. Paris does
not feel like New York or London or
well, anywhere. This is a great idea if you've got several thousand bucks
available to make the trip. Oh wait, you don't either? Okay, then how about oh,
I don't know, the internet? For both of my published books and the one I'm
writing today, I use Google Earth to "find" locales. I know exactly
where certain events take place on a map and have in many cases used the street
view (Google maps) to see what it's like to stand right there looking around in
all directions. I can describe a place as if I've actually been there because,
in a technological way, I have.
Need to know how many rounds per
minute a Thompson .45 caliber submachine gun fires. I did. Google. Answer:
around 700 / minute, depending on the version of the weapon. By the way, I also
learned that the 30-round box magazine could sometimes fall out! So everyone
preferred the 20-round mag instead. What's the service ceiling for a P-51
Mustang fighter? Answer: 41,900
feet . Time to find out these answers? 10 seconds for each
question. In the olden days, I'd have needed to go to the library and dig into
a real book. Time: hours? Although, going back to Tom Clancy, I can imagine him
back then sitting at the library, happy and contented as he digs through books
and magazines about submarines, helicopters and sonar.
Yes, in a way I write what I know
because I looked it up, have seen a documentary, or I've read a book on it. I
read at least one book a month on WWII (non-fiction), sometimes four. I watch
the History and Military channels all the time. So to be truthful, I'm really learning what I write (about) instead of
the other way around.
So there. My take on that
statement.
One last thing. I found this Clancy
quote after I wrote my blog post
above. Nice to find out I’m not alone in my thinking. And yes, I used Google.
Google R my friend.
No comments:
Post a Comment